Litigation Funding: A Financial Lifeline

Pursuing a lawsuit can put a strain on your finances. But litigation funding can provide a feasible ... - David Springer

Atlanta Accident Lawyers

When choosing a lawyer to fight your accident case, keep in mind that it is absolutely essential for ... - Alison Cole

Criminal Background Checks: A Necessity In Our Society?

A criminal background check can and should be used in any situation where safety or trust is an issu ... - Robert Lear

Driving Records - Traveling Down One's Driving History

Who's been bad and who's been good on the road? Find out through driving records. - Amit Mehta

Negotiations Within Negotiation

It is easy to draw a cat??s cradle to demonstrate the complex dynamics that exist in the above simpl ... - Charles Parselle

Main Page » Government & Politics » Constitutional Laws

Employment Law - Unfair Dismissal - Constructive Dismissal

The case of Thornley v Land Securities Trillium Ltd [2005] concerned a claim for unfair and constructive dismissal by an employee who alleged that her employer imposed a new job description on her and she contended that her contract of employment was fundamentally breached by such changes to her duties imposed by her employer. The Tribunal upheld this claim.

The employee was originally employed by the BBC as an architect in its construction management department. On or around 12 November 2001, a substantial part of the construction department was transferred to the appellant employer, Thornley, under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1982.

Following this transfer, the employer announced its plans to restructure the department. This meant that the employee's role would have changed to that of a managerial role from the hands-on architectural work she had previously done. On or around 1 October 2002, the employee attended a meeting where she indicated that she believed her position was being made redundant. She wrote to the employer stating that as a result of the proposed restructuring, her professional expertise was being dissipated and she was becoming de-skilled as an architect. She also stated that her position was being made redundant. On or around 8 December, she again wrote to her employer raising a grievance in respect of the new role, which she claimed was not comparable with the job specification of the role she had when she was transferred to the employer.

She brought a grievance hearing and following this hearing on 28 January 2003, the employee was informed that her position was not redundant. On 13 February, she resigned on the grounds of constructive dismissal. The employee then made an employment tribunal claim where she claimed constructive dismissal. The tribunal found that the effective cause of the employee's resignation had been the imposition of the new job description, which fundamentally breached the terms of her contract, with the result that the employee was entitled to resign and to be treated as having been dismissed. The tribunal therefore upheld her claim. The employer appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).

The employer in its appeal contended that the tribunal had misconstrued the employee's contract of employment:
The tribunal's decision was perverse;
The issues for the determination by the EAT were whether the tribunal had erred in arriving at its conclusion with regard to:
the extent of the employee's duties under her contract;
the extent to which those duties were to be changed;
whether the employer had been entitled to change her duties; and
if not, whether the employer's breach of contract was a fundamental breach entitling her to resign.
The EAT dismissed the appeal and held that in the circumstances:

the tribunal was entitled to conclude that the changes to the employee's duties under her contract of employment were a fundamental breach of her contract;
the tribunal did not err in its construction of the employee's contract or in concluding that by the changes proposed to her duties, the employer had intended not to be bound by her contract;
the tribunal's decision that the employee was entitled to resign on the basis of constructive dismissal was correct;
no error could be detected in the way in which the tribunal identified the employee's express duties under her contract of employment;
the tribunal's conclusions on the evidence that there were significant changes to her duties, which would have had the effect of deskilling her as an architect, were unimpeachable; and
the employee's contract, read as a whole, did not permit the employer to change the employee's duties to the extent and nature it had proposed.
If you require further information contact us.

Email: enquiries@rtcoopers.com

? RT COOPERS, 2005. This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight general issues. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to particular circumstances.

Author: Dr Rosanna Cooper

Author Bio:

RT Coopers Solicitors, solicitors, solicitor, EMPLOYMENT LAWYER, redundancy, redundancy law, legal advice, law, legal, lawyers, LAWYER, employment law, employment lawyers, employment law advice, employment solicitors, employment tribunal, employers, employees, Sex Discrimination, Discrimination Claims, Unfavourable treatment, race discrimination, racial discrimination, Unfair Dismissals, law firm, FIRM, Sex discrimination, data protection, Sexual harassment, maternity rights, Maternity and Paternity Disputes, Outsourcing Contracts, Senior Executive Appointments and Service Agreements, Suspensions, Tribunal Claims, bringing a claim to the employment tribunal, TUPE Transfers, Redundancy, Breach of Contract Disputes, Employment Contracts, Staff Handbooks, Wrongful dismissals, Contract Drafting, Contract Dispute, Equal Pay, Right to Equal pay, contracts, Contract Disputes. lease contact us for more information: enquiries@rtcoopers.com or visit our website at www.rtcoopers.com/practice_employment.php

This article can be searched using: Employment Law - Unfair Dismissal - Constructive Dismissal, Government & Politics

Friggin Lawyers

Why People are Afraid to Turn in Illegal Immigration Violations at Their Local Carwash

Courtroom FEA: But my expert has hand calculations

The Process of Family Court Restraining Orders

Criminal Injury Claim - Are You Serious

Fraud - Are You A Mark Waiting To Be Made?

Gaston County Criminal Records For Residents

Demystifying the Process of Accepting Credit Cards as an Attorney

Social Security Member??s Concerns

Houston Mesothelioma Lawyers



Tour & Travel

Self Healing

Fashion & Relationships

Realty & Property

Culture & Art

Automobiles

Fitness & Health

Online & Indoor Games

Software & Networking

Recreation & Entertainment

Shopping Online

Healthcare & Medicine

Careers & Employment

Sports

Business & Commerce

Events & News

Children

Finance & Investment

Government & Politics

Eating & Drinking

Garden & Home

Education & Reference

Science & Research

Society & Communities

Main Page -> Privacy Policy -> Terms & Conditions

Employment Law - Unfair Dismissal - Constructive Dismissal

Related Articles